The de jure was moot. The de facto was real. If they continued to sit in the back of the bus, then what was successful? A piece of paper?RedheadedStranger » 12 Dec 2023, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Your point is moot.
Where they chose to sit after the fact is irrelevant dip ****.
The boycott got the law changed, which is what it intended to do. Like I said, despite your running around in circles, you're still wrong. The boycott was successful.
You lose... again.